Interview Performance: In Transition Candidate Versus The Employed Candidate

Have you ever wondered if being in-transition makes you less attractive in an interview?  The answer may be “Yes”, but not for the reasons you may think.

My colleague Marcia Ballinger from Keystone Search and I were having coffee and we got on the topic of interviewing.  She shared some amazing insight into how in-transition candidates effectively derail their chances during the interview.

Marcia has submitted many in-transition candidates for her clients’ consideration because they have the right skills and experiences that make them attractive to a client – regardless of their employment status.  Also, Marcia’s firm has sat in interviews as an observer for the past five years, so she has seen both types of candidates in action.

She has observed a pattern of behavior from the in-transition candidates which lowered their chances because they made themselves an ‘outlier’ when compared other candidates – but in the wrong direction.

Much like that old joke about when you and buddy are being chased by a bear, you don’t have to run faster than the bear, just your buddy.  When it comes to hiring, the candidate selected is not the best at everything, they are simply better than the other candidates.

Here are the traits that Marcia has seen from in-transition candidates are going to get you caught by the bear.

  • They talk more and listen less.
  • They are very quickly convinced that an opportunity is “perfect” for them, even when they don’t have all the facts.   Marcia said that she frequently has in-transition candidates proclaim that they are ‘perfect’ for a position, even before they have seen a job description.  (Writer comment: For an executive position, these can be literally ‘million dollar’ decisions given the potential impact of the executive on a business.  Who makes million dollar decisions with no information?)
  • They lean forward.
  • They don’t always wait for the speaker to finish answering the question.
  • They are glib, surface, and less “thoughtful.”
  • They talk faster, as though they are trying to “squeeze” more in.
  • They seek to persuade, not to understand.

Having interviewed during my own transition, I’ll admit to being guilty of these behaviors.  At the time I felt as though I was displaying my eagerness and interest, but now I see it was my anxious feelings shining through.

How does someone with a job behave during an interview?  Here’s what Marcia has observed:

  • These people are picky.  They are choosey.
  • Instead of trying to convince, they are waiting to be convinced.
  • They are genuinely interested in learning more and investigating whether the opportunity could be a fit.  But, they do not come in convinced that it IS a fit.
  • There tends to be more mutuality in the discussions with employed candidates.  Employed candidates see themselves as ‘peers’, so the interview is more like two business people having a meeting.
  • For the hiring executive, it feels more like a regular meeting between a boss and a staff member, and less like an outsider, or a “salesperson.”

For you and me, these types of ‘insider’ insights are pure gold since its behavior from fellow candidates – both what’s working and what’s not.  However, Marcia made another point which I think is more relevant: The in-transition candidates’ behaviors arise from their circumstances and build over time; therefore, they need to work harder to suppress these behaviors.

The employed candidate comes into the interview with the ability to walk away, which gives them a position of strength.  They feel less overall risk and certainty no reason to push or persuade.  This is why the discussion is more relaxed and interactive.

Can an in-transition candidate give themselves the walk away power?  While perhaps not at the same level of the employed candidate, you can get close if you go into an interview with this mindset: I don’t want to be interviewing a year from now; therefore, I need to be sure this is a job where I can truly succeed and will be retained.

If this approach helps you avoid being back in-transition in the near term, it’s a powerful motivation to help you make sure this is the right position.  (If you are at the point, either financially or emotionally, that you to just get into a role please see: The Art of Settling for Less).

My thanks to Marcia for sharing this amazing insight that will help all of us get the most out of our interviews.

Good luck today!

Mark

Know Your Buyer

At a start-up firm all of the processes, formalities, etc. simply don’t exist yet, so your sole focus is on finding and convincing client to pay you something (also, you need the money!).

To do this, you identify the client’s need, what gets them to act and where to tell them.   You also must understand how the same product can be used by different types of clients.

Take the mobile phone: Adults talk.  Teens text.  Listen to the ads sometime, same device, very different messages about what the mobile phone does for each group.

Take the CFO position:  No two companies define the role exactly the same (different boards, CEO, philosophy, etc.).  This is true for all positions: Same skill set, just applied differently for each company.

That said most of us miss the opportunity to differentiate ourselves because of the resume submitted. 

I used the same resume for every role until I realized that someone else was translating how my accomplishments and experiences would fit their company needs.  It just was not happening.  So I had to do it myself.

Why? The best person does not always get the job.  It’s the person who can best tell their story who gets the job.  This is not a parlor trick, but comes from someone taking the time to review the company needs and matching up their experience.  This enables them to write and talk in depth about both sides.

GOOD IDEA #1: Create different resumes for different roles.

IMPLEMENTATION ROADBLOCK FOR GOOD IDEA #1: Too many edits.  A common risk of continuous rewrites is that new ideas get edited in after application.  So your resume loses clarity.

SOLUTION FOR ROADBLOCK FOR GOOD IDEA #1: Write a resume for each role you seek.  Start by writing down the company needs each role fulfills.  Then write down the duties of the role.  Lastly, write down what skills needed to perform those duties.

I have four resumes: Mid-size private (CFO), Family-owned (CFO), Large public firm (Divisional VP) and start-up firm (CFO).

The benefit of having the four versions is that I’ve identified the majority of what’s important to each type of company.  It is much easier to create a version that matches what any specific company is seeking.

You will get in a situation where you don’t know what the company is seeking, so pick the version you feel best matches.

Good luck today.

Mark

What I Believe, What I Need to Believe

As a CFO/Finance executive, I’ve looked at and/or produced a couple hundred business cases. To determine the validity of a business case, I’ve developed a simple system to figure out where to ask more questions. I ask myself “What do I believe and what do I need to believe”.

For example, if our company was expanding an existing product line. I would believe they can do that. If they are going to sell it to an entirely new customer set. I would say I need to believe it. So I would spend trying to determine if we understood the new customers’ needs, if the product fit, etc.

Now take your resume and ask the same questions of believe and need to believe, but from a prospective recruiter, HR, or hiring manager viewpoint (or chair).

Most people who read a resume can figure out by a title and company size if the bullet points generally fit the role a person had. They can establish the ‘what they believe’ based on your resume and knowledge of the industry, profession and role.

Generally, what they ‘need to believe’ are the results claimed (e.g. ‘Saved $5 million annually from ….), because unless they were at the same firm, it is tough to validate. But just imagine the power those statements would have if they were validated.

So whether through your referrals, non-confidential copies of past work, 3rd party references, awards, etc. try to line up as much of what needs to be believed as possible. Actions do speak louder than words, so help prove it!

A quick author aside, I have been tremendously humbled by the success of the Candidates Chair site – with over 20,000 visitors from 75 countries, as it has been fellow candidates sharing with one another that have been a major part of the success. So please know you have my thanks and keeping the sharing.

Good luck this week!

Mark Richards

www.candidateschair.com – Tools and Advice from a Candidate’s viewpoint to help get past job search roadblocks and keep your spirit strong. Please take a visit.

Copyright CandidatesChair.com